It's hard to ask Ken a question these days, so maybe someone can speak up. I bought a template from Ken for his take on a 'Norman Blake' version of a guitar and I'm using it as a reference for my current project. Ken gave rim heights at both ends, and I have no idea if these heights were the rim proper or the finished (rim + top + back) body heights. The difference is a quarter-inch, not a small thing.
There may be a convention I don't know that could answer this, but I don't know what it is and I'm lost at the moment.
Thanks, everybody.
KMG template dimension question
-
- Posts: 984
- Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2012 12:30 pm
- Location: Granby, CT
KMG template dimension question
Peter Havriluk
-
- Posts: 2746
- Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2011 8:33 pm
- Location: Seattle
- Contact:
Re: KMG template dimension question
No idea, but you might compare it with the Martin 000-28G size if that is the basis of the Norman Blake version that Ken sold. I know the main difference in the Martin "Norman Blake" was changing it to a short scale 12 fret body join.
I found generally on most plans the dimensions include the top and back.
I found generally on most plans the dimensions include the top and back.
-
- Posts: 984
- Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2012 12:30 pm
- Location: Granby, CT
Re: KMG template dimension question
Thanks, John. I think I knew I was asking a question whose answer would very likely be convention and not something quotable.
Peter Havriluk