Page 1 of 1
Tonewood Thickness
Posted: Fri Aug 17, 2018 6:54 pm
by Nate Peirson
Hi all, I will be building a 00028 with Sinker Redwood top and Black Walnut back and sides. I picked up the wood a couple years ago and am finally able to get to it. I wonder if anyone has opinions on top (Sinker Redwood) thickness? Also back and side thickness for the Black Walnut. I would love all of your sage advice and look forward to the build.
Re: Tonewood Thickness - one person's opinions
Posted: Fri Aug 17, 2018 10:46 pm
by peter havriluk
OP might see if he can find discussions of how thick Martin makes their sides and backs. The side thickness is a critical dimension as it controls how easily the sides bend. Too thick for the piece of wood equals broken wood.
The top, well, it depends on how flexible the top is and how it rings when tap-tuned.
Both top and b/s thickness determinations are skilled judgements. I think that cookbook numbers won't give optimum results. The advice and suggestions from a skilled luthier, in person, are necessary to optimize wood thickness.
Re: Tonewood Thickness
Posted: Sun Aug 19, 2018 12:13 am
by Tim Benware
Nate Peirson wrote:Hi all, I will be building a 00028 with Sinker Redwood top and Black Walnut back and sides. I picked up the wood a couple years ago and am finally able to get to it. I wonder if anyone has opinions on top (Sinker Redwood) thickness? Also back and side thickness for the Black Walnut. I would love all of your sage advice and look forward to the build.
I have built a dozen or so with Sinker Redwood and they have come in between .115 and .120" (.005 to .010" thicker than my spruce tops). I tap them to make my final decision so I guess there is something to that.
I initially thickness my sides to between .080 and .085" (I use a fox style bender), after I am done bending and leveling the sides they are around .070 to .080" in thickness.