Gypsy small mouth
Posted: Mon Feb 10, 2014 8:48 pm
This will be a long sequence of posts before it is over. Ken's gypsy mold arrived a couple of days ago and my first step will be to modify it slightly to accommodate a slightly wider fingerboard than is standard for this style guitar. People have bigger hands today than they did 100 years ago. I am also in the process of modifying the Michael Collins plan to create a sound that is darker and warmer. This design is influenced by John Monteleone's version of the Maccaferri-Selmer instrument as well as some ideas I have picked up from Trevor Gore's book.
Monteleone observed in an interview that it is 10 times harder to get string energy to travel across the grain of the top than with it. For that reason and because I am so impressed with a 1920's Oscar Schmidt Ladder Braced parlor guitar I recently acquired, I am changing the design of the top to get the energy out to the edges and to hopefully let it release there. Thus there are far fewer braces on the top than one normally finds on a Maccaferri-Selmer and they will be constructed like that of a ladder braced with a pinned bridge (like Monteleone used on his version of the gypsy design). Current plans call for only the upper most brace to be coupled to the sides, and it will be firmly coupled.
The sound hole will be slightly larger than the standard gypsy small mouth but much smaller than most 15 3/4 inch guitars. This favors lowering the natural frequency response of the sound box, as it does in the original design. But it is moved to the upper side of the upper bout so that the top does not have a hole in the middle of its main region of stress. This is to make up for the reduction in bracing. I will also leave this "spine" thicker than the "wings" in an effort to more rapidly convert string energy to top movement as it crosses over the top towards the sides, again without sacrificing integrity of the top and its ability to withstand the pull of the strings. I hope that the displacement of the sound hole will also enable a larger monopole and increased bass response and volume (though gypsy guitars are known for volume anyway).
I speculate that part of the reason for the dry, quick attack of the typical gypsy is found in the stiffness induced not just by multiple interconnected braces, but the arching of the extreme pliage as well, so I may use a much milder arching instead - make the top more compliant as one would do in designing a bass speaker.
The saddle placement approximates a 14 fret neck. It could wind up being 13 or 12 frets to the body.
I will post my first draft drawing and welcome comments. I plan on getting some input from Brian Burns too.
Monteleone observed in an interview that it is 10 times harder to get string energy to travel across the grain of the top than with it. For that reason and because I am so impressed with a 1920's Oscar Schmidt Ladder Braced parlor guitar I recently acquired, I am changing the design of the top to get the energy out to the edges and to hopefully let it release there. Thus there are far fewer braces on the top than one normally finds on a Maccaferri-Selmer and they will be constructed like that of a ladder braced with a pinned bridge (like Monteleone used on his version of the gypsy design). Current plans call for only the upper most brace to be coupled to the sides, and it will be firmly coupled.
The sound hole will be slightly larger than the standard gypsy small mouth but much smaller than most 15 3/4 inch guitars. This favors lowering the natural frequency response of the sound box, as it does in the original design. But it is moved to the upper side of the upper bout so that the top does not have a hole in the middle of its main region of stress. This is to make up for the reduction in bracing. I will also leave this "spine" thicker than the "wings" in an effort to more rapidly convert string energy to top movement as it crosses over the top towards the sides, again without sacrificing integrity of the top and its ability to withstand the pull of the strings. I hope that the displacement of the sound hole will also enable a larger monopole and increased bass response and volume (though gypsy guitars are known for volume anyway).
I speculate that part of the reason for the dry, quick attack of the typical gypsy is found in the stiffness induced not just by multiple interconnected braces, but the arching of the extreme pliage as well, so I may use a much milder arching instead - make the top more compliant as one would do in designing a bass speaker.
The saddle placement approximates a 14 fret neck. It could wind up being 13 or 12 frets to the body.
I will post my first draft drawing and welcome comments. I plan on getting some input from Brian Burns too.