a couple of old European methods
Posted: Fri Jan 03, 2014 7:53 pm
The adjustable (from outside) neck - a few examples - and the cantilevered neck. Just some fyi.
Yeah the pix are not in order.
As to the cantilivered neck - it's more than a gimmick. Somewhere on another forum Ken Cierp mentioned that he really liked the idea - that was a number of years ago and he might have a different view now.
-it does allow for great movement of the top under the f/b extension IF no upper transverse bar is used. Otherwise that area is sonically a very little contribution.
-It does give easier access to the upper frets
-It does pull the bridge into more activity - I'm not as sure about this.
As to the adjustable neck - it's easy enough to do, and sure beats a reset or having to change out saddles for varying conditions. And it has been used for over 200 years, successfully.
I do have a question about the geometries of the cantilevered necks and the angle relation to the bridge/saddle. Does anyone have an idea how the neck angle is different?
Yeah the pix are not in order.
As to the cantilivered neck - it's more than a gimmick. Somewhere on another forum Ken Cierp mentioned that he really liked the idea - that was a number of years ago and he might have a different view now.
-it does allow for great movement of the top under the f/b extension IF no upper transverse bar is used. Otherwise that area is sonically a very little contribution.
-It does give easier access to the upper frets
-It does pull the bridge into more activity - I'm not as sure about this.
As to the adjustable neck - it's easy enough to do, and sure beats a reset or having to change out saddles for varying conditions. And it has been used for over 200 years, successfully.
I do have a question about the geometries of the cantilevered necks and the angle relation to the bridge/saddle. Does anyone have an idea how the neck angle is different?