Page 1 of 3

Neck angle second chance.....

Posted: Tue Oct 01, 2013 8:34 pm
by MarkAndrew1
So, after my first neck angle debacle (which I remedied) I have another
chance to do it right on my second. I have flush cut the top and back
to meet the sides. I have check the angle on my Martin neck and it's
almost 91deg. I don't have a digital angle gauge so that's what it looks
like to me.

So, if it's 91deg at the neck then the complimentary angle at the
body should be 89deg. 91+89=180. Am I on the right track?

Re: Neck angle second chance.....

Posted: Tue Oct 01, 2013 9:27 pm
by John Parchem
Are you sure that neck angle is not 89?

Re: Neck angle second chance.....

Posted: Tue Oct 01, 2013 9:36 pm
by MarkAndrew1
johnparchem wrote:Are you sure that neck angle is not 89?
i know it's hard to see but the black line on the gauge is after the 90deg
point.

Re: Neck angle second chance.....

Posted: Tue Oct 01, 2013 10:30 pm
by Tim Benware
If it is a Martin neck the neck angle should be closer to 88.7* (and the body would be 91.3*). Are you sure you measured it right?

Re: Neck angle second chance.....

Posted: Tue Oct 01, 2013 10:33 pm
by MarkAndrew1
Tim Benware wrote:If it is a Martin neck the neck angle should be closer to 88.7* (and the body would be 91.3*). Are you sure you measured it right?
I got the neck from the Guitar Makers Connection. I measured it exactly
the way it's pictured. Am I holding the neck the wrong way to get the
measurement?

Re: Neck angle second chance.....

Posted: Tue Oct 01, 2013 10:46 pm
by MarkAndrew1
Tim Benware wrote:If it is a Martin neck the neck angle should be closer to 88.7* (and the body would be 91.3*). Are you sure you measured it right?
Wait....Do i go by the row of numbers on the top or the bottom? If it's
the bottom then I've been reading the angle ruler wrong; cause
I've been going by the top row!!!!!!!!!

Re: Neck angle second chance.....

Posted: Wed Oct 02, 2013 12:39 am
by John Parchem
In any case your compass is giving you both angles you need. The way you were reading it you were getting the matching rim to top angle which is obtuse.