Page 2 of 2
Re: Doug Fir?
Posted: Fri Oct 05, 2012 2:32 pm
by Kevin in California
That was my thought......sappy....Think of those Doug fir 2 x 4's you've used with the sap oozing out. Wouldn't be pretty on a guitar.
Kevin
Re: Doug Fir?
Posted: Fri Oct 05, 2012 3:10 pm
by Dave Bagwill
Well, I did not get a response from the supplier when I asked for references to builders who had used the stuff over a period of time. Maybe that's my answer.
Edit: I did just get this. I will contact the builders of a few of the guitars in the gallery and get back to you.
Well, it doesn't sound like he had a good experience, nor did he actually
try it.. Yes, I would disagree since we have sold many sets and had no
issues. If left unsealed, sap can sometimes surface, but it cleans off. We
do not provide our clients names, but if you look in our guitar gallery,
Re: Doug Fir?
Posted: Fri Oct 05, 2012 4:22 pm
by Dave Bagwill
Re: Doug Fir?
Posted: Fri Oct 05, 2012 4:46 pm
by Tim Benware
deadedith wrote:There won't be any stinkin' tests.
Why? Because the shipping, for one top that cost $50, is $15.00.
That's for a two hour trip, there to here.
Can't make a living paying that unconscionable (sorry Tim - I mean 'too big' :-)) amount. Not gonna pay it , would not be prudent at this or any other juncture.
Thanks Dave - you obviously now realize your highly magnemated vernacular is too supercopious for my inadequate comprehension.
Re: Doug Fir?
Posted: Fri Oct 05, 2012 5:01 pm
by Dave Bagwill
I must look up them big wordy thingies you rote, Tim. Is there a book someone could read to me that 'splains it?
Re: Doug Fir?
Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2012 10:25 am
by Dave Bagwill
A page of experiences/thoughts on Doug Fir. Interesting comments.
http://www.ukuleleunderground.com/forum ... 36605.html