Page 2 of 6
Re: The compensated nut -- is it worth the effort?
Posted: Thu Apr 12, 2012 1:52 pm
by Dave Bagwill
This is a long and interesting article on theory that also compares some of the commercially available compensated stuff. I don't know what to make of it, but it seems to make sense.
http://setitupbetter.com/index.php
Hey, Ken, NOBODY charges for vid......wait a minute, my bad, sure they do...:-)
Re: The compensated nut -- is it worth the effort?
Posted: Fri Apr 13, 2012 7:22 pm
by Woodyok
Thanks Ken,
I had the feeling that there are more variables involved. So, if you play in a certain style within certain parts of the fret board, a compensated nut is worth the effort, but not necessarily for every player.
Re: The compensated nut -- is it worth the effort?
Posted: Sat Apr 14, 2012 9:45 am
by ken cierp
It would seem that a solo player that uses open strings and also moves up the fingerboard passed the octave would want this extra precision. Interesting, I had corresponded with Laurence Juber (one of the best!) regarding the Buzz Fienten system and compensated nuts in general -- his view was that his guitars without the feature were perfectly acceptable for stage and studio work. He had no plans to even experiment.
Re: The compensated nut -- is it worth the effort?
Posted: Sat Apr 14, 2012 10:35 am
by Tim Benware
Ken, any idea how accurate a "Snark" tuner is compared to a strobe? After learning a little more about this method I tested one of the guitars I built up and down the fret board and there was very variance. I don't know that I even have the ear to tell the difference, so for me I don't think I'd take the time do it. I might try it once out of curiosity.
Re: The compensated nut -- is it worth the effort?
Posted: Sat Apr 14, 2012 11:08 am
by ken cierp
I've never used a Snark -- I do own the Petersen Strobosoft product (expensive) -- however I found that this
free software http://www.aptuner.com/cgi-bin/aptuner/apmain.html is just as accurate and in my view much easier to use than Strobosoft.
Re: The compensated nut -- is it worth the effort?
Posted: Sun Apr 15, 2012 11:44 am
by Woodyok
Well I'm not Laurence Juber but I have been playing a long time both cording and up the neck. I have really never had a tuning problem except with the low E when using a capo. No audience has ever complained about my guitar being out of tune. Sometimes I believe people have a tendency to over think these things. It is interesting but I'm not sure it is worth the time or effort.
By the way your compensated bridge for the Ditson worked perfectly.
Re: The compensated nut -- is it worth the effort?
Posted: Sun Apr 15, 2012 3:46 pm
by ken cierp
Here's a little article that will make one wonder if there is value in messing with a compensated nut -- the hearing test is fun and the last paragraph is really telling:
http://www.aqdi.com/tuner.htm