The compensated nut -- is it worth the effort?

Nuts -- Saddles -- Fret dressing -- Intonation -- Neck Relief
Dave Bagwill
Posts: 5951
Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2011 7:44 pm

Re: The compensated nut -- is it worth the effort?

Post by Dave Bagwill » Thu Apr 12, 2012 1:52 pm

This is a long and interesting article on theory that also compares some of the commercially available compensated stuff. I don't know what to make of it, but it seems to make sense.
http://setitupbetter.com/index.php


Hey, Ken, NOBODY charges for vid......wait a minute, my bad, sure they do...:-)
-Under permanent construction

Woodyok
Posts: 69
Joined: Sun Dec 18, 2011 12:36 pm
Location: Prescott, Arizona

Re: The compensated nut -- is it worth the effort?

Post by Woodyok » Fri Apr 13, 2012 7:22 pm

Thanks Ken,
I had the feeling that there are more variables involved. So, if you play in a certain style within certain parts of the fret board, a compensated nut is worth the effort, but not necessarily for every player.
Woody OKeefe
Prescott,Arizona

ken cierp
Posts: 3924
Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2011 11:23 pm

Re: The compensated nut -- is it worth the effort?

Post by ken cierp » Sat Apr 14, 2012 9:45 am

It would seem that a solo player that uses open strings and also moves up the fingerboard passed the octave would want this extra precision. Interesting, I had corresponded with Laurence Juber (one of the best!) regarding the Buzz Fienten system and compensated nuts in general -- his view was that his guitars without the feature were perfectly acceptable for stage and studio work. He had no plans to even experiment.

Tim Benware
Posts: 1489
Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2011 1:22 pm
Location: Asheboro, NC

Re: The compensated nut -- is it worth the effort?

Post by Tim Benware » Sat Apr 14, 2012 10:35 am

Ken, any idea how accurate a "Snark" tuner is compared to a strobe? After learning a little more about this method I tested one of the guitars I built up and down the fret board and there was very variance. I don't know that I even have the ear to tell the difference, so for me I don't think I'd take the time do it. I might try it once out of curiosity.
I've "Ben-Had" again!
Tim Benware
Creedmoor, NC

ken cierp
Posts: 3924
Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2011 11:23 pm

Re: The compensated nut -- is it worth the effort?

Post by ken cierp » Sat Apr 14, 2012 11:08 am

I've never used a Snark -- I do own the Petersen Strobosoft product (expensive) -- however I found that this free software http://www.aptuner.com/cgi-bin/aptuner/apmain.html is just as accurate and in my view much easier to use than Strobosoft.

Woodyok
Posts: 69
Joined: Sun Dec 18, 2011 12:36 pm
Location: Prescott, Arizona

Re: The compensated nut -- is it worth the effort?

Post by Woodyok » Sun Apr 15, 2012 11:44 am

Well I'm not Laurence Juber but I have been playing a long time both cording and up the neck. I have really never had a tuning problem except with the low E when using a capo. No audience has ever complained about my guitar being out of tune. Sometimes I believe people have a tendency to over think these things. It is interesting but I'm not sure it is worth the time or effort.

By the way your compensated bridge for the Ditson worked perfectly.
Woody OKeefe
Prescott,Arizona

ken cierp
Posts: 3924
Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2011 11:23 pm

Re: The compensated nut -- is it worth the effort?

Post by ken cierp » Sun Apr 15, 2012 3:46 pm

Here's a little article that will make one wonder if there is value in messing with a compensated nut -- the hearing test is fun and the last paragraph is really telling:

http://www.aqdi.com/tuner.htm

Post Reply