Page 2 of 4
Re: 'Plate Mate' on new construction?
Posted: Wed Oct 15, 2014 7:24 pm
by ken cierp
I use .10" +/-
Re: 'Plate Mate' on new construction?
Posted: Wed Oct 15, 2014 7:41 pm
by peter havriluk
Thanks!
Re: 'Plate Mate' on new construction?
Posted: Thu Oct 16, 2014 2:25 am
by Dave Bagwill
This odd-looking bracing system - I've cropped off some of the oddness :-) - has an interesting feature, in that the main part of the bridge plate appears to be the same material as the top, but with this difference, that a piece of carbon fiber has been inlaid where the ball ends will be pulled up against it.
The cf is very light of course, and very hard - what do you guys/gals think of the concept?
Re: 'Plate Mate' on new construction?
Posted: Thu Oct 16, 2014 10:04 am
by Tim Benware
If it sounds good and works for its intended purpose, I think it's great. But one has to decide if what seems to be the extra effort to install it is worth it.
Re: 'Plate Mate' on new construction?
Posted: Thu Oct 16, 2014 11:39 am
by peter havriluk
This is an opportunity for an engineer who is familiar with composite materials to speak up.
Re: 'Plate Mate' on new construction?
Posted: Thu Oct 16, 2014 11:58 am
by Dave Bagwill
I was just pointing out that, if a brass plate is a viable option (and to many, it is) then something lighter and tougher, CF, might be viabler. (Yes I made up that word). The extra effort would be minimal I would think.
Re: 'Plate Mate' on new construction?
Posted: Thu Oct 16, 2014 12:04 pm
by peter havriluk
Dave, I think you're making a very valid point. I just don't know whether c/f sheet is good stuff to take point loads at the edges of holes in it. For sure its inflexibility would stiffen the bridge plate's bending under string tension.