My first soundboard finished

Wood choice logic, brace shapes, braces patterns -- what and why for the "heart of the guitar"
Dave Bagwill
Posts: 5952
Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2011 7:44 pm

Re: My first soundboard finished

Post by Dave Bagwill » Thu Nov 21, 2013 5:22 pm

I found a link to a type of deflection tester, still no plans, just pics
http://community.berea.edu/guitarresear ... Tests.html
-Under permanent construction

ken cierp
Posts: 3924
Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2011 11:23 pm

Re: My first soundboard finished

Post by ken cierp » Thu Nov 21, 2013 6:42 pm

Sorry no plans

Dave Bagwill
Posts: 5952
Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2011 7:44 pm

Re: My first soundboard finished

Post by Dave Bagwill » Thu Nov 21, 2013 7:04 pm

I didn't mean if you had any Ken, just wondering if you or anyone had seen any. I don't there are any out there.
-Under permanent construction

Walter Massa
Posts: 15
Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2013 10:00 pm
Location: Springfield, MA

Re: My first soundboard finished

Post by Walter Massa » Thu Nov 21, 2013 7:34 pm

In theory lighter is better (cleats add weight) less energy is needed to move the soundboard therefore it will be more sensitive.
I assumed that because the cleats were so light that the benefit of reinforcing the seam would outweigh the possibility of an adverse reaction to tone. Do you recommend reducing their size somewhat or removing them entirely?
I'll never be satisfied with my guitar playing until God Himself tells me I'm good... and invites me on stage at Crossroads

ken cierp
Posts: 3924
Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2011 11:23 pm

Re: My first soundboard finished

Post by ken cierp » Thu Nov 21, 2013 7:54 pm

Heck no I would not remove them -- just making a point. But it is added weight that unfortunately will do little to prevent seam seperation (the glue is stronger than the wood itself, much stated by chemical producers and is proven to be true) so if RH drops to a point where the sound board bellies down a grain crack will happen somewhere anyhow.

To lighten the top many makers have gone to the pratice of shaving the braces to a tall triangular configuration -- seems like a good idea since, do to the beam effect the brace is still strong and now lighter.

John Link
Posts: 800
Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2012 8:01 pm
Location: Kalamazoo, MI

Re: My first soundboard finished

Post by John Link » Thu Nov 21, 2013 8:53 pm

Somogyi shows a deflection tester and process in his book, but it is for an unbraced plate.

Once plates are braced, he places the braced top into a mold that clamps them tight as if they were glued to the sides and finishes the work based on the sounds he gets after exciting the top with his finger.

Somogyi's seems like a good idea if one uses the same box outline over and over. In theory, a top that just never sounds or (insert whatever criterion suits you here) quite right can be discarded before gluing it to sides. Otherwise, Ken has pretty much offered the best answer to the question: whether to glue the top or the back to the sides first.

"Light 'n tight" will take anyone a long way.
Last edited by John Link on Fri Nov 22, 2013 9:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
John

TonyinNYC
Posts: 1510
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2011 9:00 pm

Re: My first soundboard finished

Post by TonyinNYC » Fri Nov 22, 2013 11:27 am

That's exactly how I like my women too.

Post Reply