Any advantage to this at all?
-
- Posts: 5951
- Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2011 7:44 pm
-
- Posts: 5951
- Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2011 7:44 pm
Re: Any advantage to this at all?
What is the easiest and cleanest way to drill these slanted holes - basically pocket holes?
- Attachments
-
- 1bridge.jpg (126.13 KiB) Viewed 753 times
-Under permanent construction
-
- Posts: 5951
- Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2011 7:44 pm
-
- Posts: 2746
- Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2011 8:33 pm
- Location: Seattle
- Contact:
Re: Any advantage to this at all?
Are you sure those holes are slanted? I would drill straight down and use a file to make the string path on the top of the bridge.
-
- Posts: 5951
- Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2011 7:44 pm
Re: Any advantage to this at all?
John - I did try the holes straight down, at first. Turns out that the slanted holes give a more positive 'lock' when the strings are at tension.
-Under permanent construction
-
- Posts: 2799
- Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2011 4:19 pm
Re: Any advantage to this at all?
The slanted hole makes sense and I can see the ball end grabbing the plate easier.
Kevin
Kevin
-
- Posts: 5951
- Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2011 7:44 pm
Re: Any advantage to this at all?
I'm going to reinforce the bridge plate with a thin sheet of carbon fiber. This will keep the ball ends nice and secure and protect the plate. The slot in the CF will just have to be the width of the windings around the ball end of the strings, of course.
I'm not sure if laminating the cf onto the plate, or setting it into the plate is a better idea - it will come down to weight I suppose.
Any suggestions on the thickness of the cf?
I'm not sure if laminating the cf onto the plate, or setting it into the plate is a better idea - it will come down to weight I suppose.
Any suggestions on the thickness of the cf?
-Under permanent construction