The idea of Making a Martin a better Martin

Sequencing -- clamping schemes -- logic, do's and don'ts
ken cierp
Posts: 3924
Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2011 11:23 pm

Re: The idea of Making a Martin a better Martin

Post by ken cierp » Fri Feb 15, 2013 11:40 am

To me its about the treatment of the collectable articles and the ethics.

http://www.premierguitar.com/Magazine/I ... feits.aspx

Kevin in California
Posts: 2807
Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2011 4:19 pm

Re: The idea of Making a Martin a better Martin

Post by Kevin in California » Fri Feb 15, 2013 2:04 pm

All I'm concerned about is making a Sjostrand a better Sjostrand!
nuff said!

Kevin

Tim Benware
Posts: 1489
Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2011 1:22 pm
Location: Asheboro, NC

Re: The idea of Making a Martin a better Martin

Post by Tim Benware » Fri Feb 15, 2013 2:57 pm

kencierp wrote:To me its about the treatment of the collectable articles and the ethics.

http://www.premierguitar.com/Magazine/I ... feits.aspx
I agree if there is in fact a planned attempt to defraud (how could i think otherwise after 35 years in law enforcement) as the article indicates. I guess the question is how to ensure that after the conversion takes place some one down the line doesn't use that honest work to later defraud some unsuspecting buyer.

So Ken, are you saying it should never be done or that when it is some type of marking is permanently attached to the instrument to so indicate the change or something else? I can see where that may be the ethical thing to do.
I've "Ben-Had" again!
Tim Benware
Creedmoor, NC

ken cierp
Posts: 3924
Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2011 11:23 pm

Re: The idea of Making a Martin a better Martin

Post by ken cierp » Fri Feb 15, 2013 3:28 pm

Certainly I can only speak for myself -- for me any modification done during a restoration that changes the identity of a collectible to something other then what was the original factory or artist's designation is not proper.

Post Reply