Hi guys,
I bought Pau Ferro for my back and side. Any thoughts on thickness for these with this wood?
Pau Ferro
-
- Posts: 68
- Joined: Tue Jul 11, 2023 8:13 am
- Location: La Pocatière, Québec
-
- Posts: 21
- Joined: Thu May 10, 2018 7:02 am
Re: Pau Ferro
Seems like the current thicknessing is by ear. The woop woop sound when you hold the edges and vibrate it like a piece of sheet metal.
-
- Posts: 2803
- Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2011 4:19 pm
Re: Pau Ferro
I think typical specs will be fine here.
Sides are usually around .080 to .090". Harder to bend when more than .090.
Your back somewhere between .100 and .125" should come out well.
Sides are usually around .080 to .090". Harder to bend when more than .090.
Your back somewhere between .100 and .125" should come out well.
-
- Posts: 984
- Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2012 12:30 pm
- Location: Granby, CT
Re: Pau Ferro
I've thinned soundboards to try to get the shimmering sheet-metal sound 'banjopicks' mentioned. I haven't done it for backs and/or sides. I concur with Kevin's comments on b/s thicknesses. We don't have the opportunity to wiggle, flex, or otherwise manipulate OP's back and side panels. There's lots more to optimizing side woods than thinning to a specification, none of which we will be doing here. Eighty thousandths for sides is certainly a valid measurement for me. Thicker sides ain't better, they'll just refuse to bend nice.
Peter Havriluk
Re: Pau Ferro
Second that. Even 0.08" for the sides can be tough on bending, as I experienced again yesterday on the Pau Ferro of my current project.
Herman
Herman
-
- Posts: 2803
- Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2011 4:19 pm
Re: Pau Ferro
Herman
Whatcha making?
Whatcha making?