routine fingerboard, bridge thickness, saddle depth

Sequencing -- clamping schemes -- logic, do's and don'ts
Post Reply
peter havriluk
Posts: 984
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2012 12:30 pm
Location: Granby, CT

routine fingerboard, bridge thickness, saddle depth

Post by peter havriluk » Mon Dec 12, 2016 1:31 am

I'm in the midst of scratchbuilding some fingerboards and bridges. I am curious about the typical finished thickness of bridges and fingerboards and the depth of the saddle slot in the bridge.

I think the saddle-slot dimension could be something like 'leave .100" of the bridge beneath the saddle slot' or something similar that puts the saddle at the same height off the fingerboard regardless of the bridge's thickness. And I'm aware of not building bridges heavier than they need to be lest the bridge contribute to damping the top's vibrations.

I think I need to be aware of the results of fingerboard thickness and complementary bridge thickness, and if the fingerboard is excessively high (how much is that?) the bridge will either have too much wood in it or the saddle will be sticking way up off the soundboard, or both.

At any rate I'd appreciate some advice.

Thanks, folks.
Peter Havriluk

ken cierp
Posts: 3924
Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2011 11:23 pm

Re: routine fingerboard, bridge thickness, saddle depth

Post by ken cierp » Mon Dec 12, 2016 7:54 am

Finger boards are generally .25" thick and used on guitars that can have bridges .25"- .40 +/- -- so your concern seems to be unfounded. Far more important is the need for a straight line finger board plane passing just over the bridge mainly controlled by neck set angle. To this end the major makers have an assortment of bridges of different thicknesses so this requirement can be met. They do this because they know wood is going to act like wood regardless of all the humidity control precautions in the work place.

So its best to determine final bridge thickness along with saddle height "after the neck is set"

As for the saddle slot depth -- make it as deep and tight as possible without going through the bridge. I leave about a 1/16 "

peter havriluk
Posts: 984
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2012 12:30 pm
Location: Granby, CT

Re: routine fingerboard, bridge thickness, saddle depth

Post by peter havriluk » Mon Dec 12, 2016 10:59 am

Ken, thanks for your advice.
Peter Havriluk

johnnyg
Posts: 60
Joined: Wed Jun 17, 2015 3:12 pm

Re: routine fingerboard, bridge thickness, saddle depth

Post by johnnyg » Mon Dec 12, 2016 11:59 am

I was taught to set the neck after the bridge is in place. How do you determine the proper neck angle without the bridge? If there is a thread already explaining this just point me to it!

Thanks,
- johnnyg

ken cierp
Posts: 3924
Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2011 11:23 pm

Re: routine fingerboard, bridge thickness, saddle depth

Post by ken cierp » Mon Dec 12, 2016 1:18 pm

You may find that your actual construction was not accurate enough to meet initial "required" measurements and some tweaking may be necessary. But the idea is to make parts that match in the first place --- the neck heel and the rim slope angles on a KMG kit are already set "just like the factories do it" that way even new builders are able to end up with a guitar that is easy to play without needing to make tedious trial and error adjustments to the neck heel angle. Mathematics rules! But admittedly Mother nature can affect even the best equation, humidity can throw things off a little too.

http://www.kennethmichaelguitars.com/neckangle.html

Post Reply