1899 O-21 Sound real or a bit processed?

Things that matter and not -- Just keep it wholesome
John Link
Posts: 800
Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2012 8:01 pm
Location: Kalamazoo, MI

Re: 1899 O-21 Sound real or a bit processed?

Post by John Link » Wed Aug 12, 2015 1:57 pm

The Thomastic-Infeld strings are very interesting. .059 is a very large diameter low E string, but the silk presumably lowers the tension greatly. That and a lightly built git might blow a lot of ears. And minds.
John

Dave Bagwill
Posts: 5952
Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2011 7:44 pm

Re: 1899 O-21 Sound real or a bit processed?

Post by Dave Bagwill » Wed Aug 12, 2015 2:11 pm

The total tension of the TI Plectrums is around 164 lbs, even with the .059.
With a lighter 6th string, some Plectrum sets are down to 120 lbs or so.

similarly, for a 13-56 set of D'Addario, the tension is about 198 lbs.
Quite a savings in tension.

That Yamaha above sounded good.
-Under permanent construction

ken cierp
Posts: 3924
Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2011 11:23 pm

Re: 1899 O-21 Sound real or a bit processed?

Post by ken cierp » Wed Aug 12, 2015 4:21 pm

Bone tone -- in my view the player is definitely the key ingredient regarding how an instrument ultimately sounds.

Of course "tight and light" is what I strive for in a build, that is because to my ear guitars I've played that are on the verge of implosion seem to sound the best --- not sure if I agree with the idea that a finger style guitar can be over driven.

John Link
Posts: 800
Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2012 8:01 pm
Location: Kalamazoo, MI

Re: 1899 O-21 Sound real or a bit processed?

Post by John Link » Wed Aug 12, 2015 6:34 pm

Regarding Ken's comment that the player is the big ingredient in how an instrument sounds: Here is Chapdelaine's two pages about "great tone". It is mostly about just one thing: How to pluck a string, one string at a time. He seems to place the primary responsibility for achieving great tone on the player, not the instrument.

He also introduces the topic with some inspiring comments about the strengths and weaknesses of the guitar.

http://www.michaelchapdelaine.com/great_tone.html
John

Dave Bagwill
Posts: 5952
Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2011 7:44 pm

Re: 1899 O-21 Sound real or a bit processed?

Post by Dave Bagwill » Wed Aug 12, 2015 7:21 pm

Very good article, John!
-Under permanent construction

Tim Benware
Posts: 1489
Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2011 1:22 pm
Location: Asheboro, NC

Re: 1899 O-21 Sound real or a bit processed?

Post by Tim Benware » Wed Aug 12, 2015 10:31 pm

Listening with my headset I can hear some finger noise but it sounds like the strings are flat wound.
I've "Ben-Had" again!
Tim Benware
Creedmoor, NC

Post Reply