Tom's KMG L-00

Show us how your current project is progressing
Dave Bagwill
Posts: 5951
Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2011 7:44 pm

Re: Tom's KMG L-00

Post by Dave Bagwill » Tue Jul 14, 2015 7:51 pm

Just protection. I've had a chip or two in the past - from being clumsy - and this surgical tubing prevents any such mishaps.
-Under permanent construction

Dave Bagwill
Posts: 5951
Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2011 7:44 pm

Re: Tom's KMG L-00

Post by Dave Bagwill » Tue Jul 14, 2015 8:53 pm

Tom worked on the soundport today and did a heckuva good job. Also now protected. I believe in safe soundporting. :-)
Attachments
DSC01435.JPG
DSC01435.JPG (203.14 KiB) Viewed 1827 times
DSC01437.JPG
DSC01437.JPG (187.8 KiB) Viewed 1827 times
-Under permanent construction

Dave Bagwill
Posts: 5951
Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2011 7:44 pm

Re: Tom's KMG L-00

Post by Dave Bagwill » Sat Jul 18, 2015 6:09 pm

Installed the CF rods, and that went well enough that I felt confident we could shave the top braces quite a bit more. Now the top and rim together are very strong but very light. We will glue on the top and back next week.
Attachments
DSC01444.JPG
DSC01444.JPG (211.22 KiB) Viewed 1803 times
DSC01445.JPG
DSC01445.JPG (221.17 KiB) Viewed 1803 times
DSC01446.JPG
DSC01446.JPG (222 KiB) Viewed 1803 times
-Under permanent construction

Herman
Posts: 1673
Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2012 1:20 pm
Location: Arnhem area, the Netherlands
Contact:

Re: Tom's KMG L-00

Post by Herman » Sun Jul 19, 2015 6:09 am

Looking gooood!

ken cierp
Posts: 3924
Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2011 11:23 pm

Re: Tom's KMG L-00

Post by ken cierp » Sun Jul 19, 2015 10:02 am

What is the function of the CF rods?

Dave Bagwill
Posts: 5951
Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2011 7:44 pm

Re: Tom's KMG L-00

Post by Dave Bagwill » Sun Jul 19, 2015 11:54 am

Seems to depend on who you talk to.
-Under permanent construction

Dave Bagwill
Posts: 5951
Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2011 7:44 pm

Re: Tom's KMG L-00

Post by Dave Bagwill » Sun Jul 19, 2015 1:57 pm

Sounded like a smart a**, I did - I meant to follow up with excerpts from some earlier posts on this forum. One place was this thread: viewtopic.php?f=24&t=2243&p=20273&hilit=carbon#p20273.
Also somewhere there is positive feedback from Mike Doolin to a letter I sent him concerning this subject, who uses the cf, and Bob Matthews, I think. I'll do more looking around and find those links.

edit to add link to Bob's picture: download/file.php?id=2698

edit: Here's the thread that addresses it directly - interestingly, both Ken and John P. had, at that time, a positive remark to make about the cf rods directed to the endblock.
viewtopic.php?f=15&t=1622&hilit=doolin&start=0

And an excerpt from Doolin's letter:
"I did use graphite tubes in the Jazz Harp Guitar (also) -
doolin4,5

But there I wasn’t concerned so much about rotation of the neck block as I was about compression of the top, since the instrument has a tailpiece. The string tension translates to compressive force between the neck block and tail block, and the tubes directly bear that compressive force.

All of this is to say, that I think graphite tubes bracing the neck block is a great idea, but I do think they work better when they’re inset deeply into the neck block. When they’re just butted up against it, there isn’t as much preventing the block from rotating forward. This is especially true if the tubes go to the waist, since they’re bracing at about a 45 degree angle to the force being applied. When they go to the lower bout, they’re more in line with the force. I used rectangular bars because they’re easier to glue tightly into a notch cut in the neck block.

But in general, I think _some_ sort of neck block bracing is a good idea, even for non-cutaway guitars. And for cutaway guitars, it’s an even better idea."
-Under permanent construction

Post Reply