Stock trim routers are not suited for binding channeling

Selection of materials -- wood -- plastic -- routing the channels etc.
Post Reply
ken cierp
Posts: 3924
Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2011 11:23 pm

Stock trim routers are not suited for binding channeling

Post by ken cierp » Thu Dec 15, 2011 11:16 am

This is very important to understand if you want a professional looking binding job

http://www.kennethmichaelguitars.com/un ... nnels.html

Tim Benware
Posts: 1489
Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2011 1:22 pm
Location: Asheboro, NC

Re: Stock trim routers are not suited for binding channeling

Post by Tim Benware » Thu Dec 22, 2011 8:50 pm

I have a pretty steady hand but kept tilting that setup too so I modified it (like in the picture) to use with a tower unit. Now I can just shove it in and turn.

Image
Image
I've "Ben-Had" again!
Tim Benware
Creedmoor, NC

Tim Benware
Posts: 1489
Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2011 1:22 pm
Location: Asheboro, NC

Re: Stock trim routers are not suited for binding channeling

Post by Tim Benware » Thu Dec 22, 2011 8:51 pm

Yikes. I thought those would be smaller. First time using photobucket. Any suggestions to change image size?
I've "Ben-Had" again!
Tim Benware
Creedmoor, NC

ken cierp
Posts: 3924
Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2011 11:23 pm

Re: Stock trim routers are not suited for binding channeling

Post by ken cierp » Thu Dec 22, 2011 9:21 pm

The pic size is OK

Why that is great! Good for you -- and you still have custom dimensioning with a simple 1/4" bit and save all that $$$ not having to buy bearings. I so happen to have a vertical gadget that works similar but is not actually a tower -- an ah hah! momment for me. Coming -- fairly soon.

While I have the highest respect for the ingenuity and creativity shown here, I do however, have to rain on the parade a little. I cannot endorse or recommend such a conversion since that KMG product is not being used per instructions and has been modified to the extent that all our (KMG) design tests are no longer relevant or valid.

Post Reply