Why are sides so thin?

Solid or Laminated sides? Ribbon lining style (kerfing) - rim profiling, contouring and the logic for those choices
Post Reply
Dave Bagwill
Posts: 5951
Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2011 7:44 pm

Why are sides so thin?

Post by Dave Bagwill » Mon Feb 13, 2012 1:02 am

I totally buy into the reasoning behind the use of reverse round kerfing and therefore I use it.

But, with all the talk about stiffening the sides and different kerfing styles that affect that stiffness and all that, I wonder why we don't just makes the sides thicker? Is it because it makes the bending too difficult?
-Under permanent construction

TonyinNYC
Posts: 1510
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2011 9:00 pm

Re: Why are sides so thin?

Post by TonyinNYC » Mon Feb 13, 2012 1:44 am

Yeah. Pretty much. I bent black limba at .100" but normally that is considered thick.

Bob Matthews
Posts: 146
Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2011 8:49 am
Location: Surrey, England
Contact:

Re: Why are sides so thin?

Post by Bob Matthews » Mon Feb 13, 2012 5:06 am

Two reasons, bending and weight, the finished weight of an instrument is an aspect often overlooked by many. One of my early guitars used fairly thick cocobolo back and sides (90 thou) and it weighs a ton, although it plays beautifully and sounds rich and harmonious, it isn't a guitar that gets picked up as a go to.
Thinner sides with stiffeners are easily strong enough for the intended purpose imo.

Bob

ken cierp
Posts: 3924
Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2011 11:23 pm

Re: Why are sides so thin?

Post by ken cierp » Mon Feb 13, 2012 9:51 am

I believe "Rick Turner" and "Charles Fox" have experimented with hefty rimmed guitars. For me its a matter of favorable bending thickness -- the fact is, with thicker side blanks cracks are more likely.

Post Reply