Thinning the Perimiter

Wood choice logic, brace shapes, braces patterns -- what and why for the "heart of the guitar"
ken cierp
Posts: 3924
Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2011 11:23 pm

Re: Thinning the Perimiter

Post by ken cierp » Thu Mar 06, 2014 10:55 pm

That should work just fine.

Dave Bagwill
Posts: 5952
Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2011 7:44 pm

Re: Thinning the Perimiter

Post by Dave Bagwill » Thu Mar 06, 2014 11:29 pm

Ok, thanks.

I also saw a short vid somewhere - Somagyi, I think - he was sanding right behind the bridge location, said it is one place that really responds well to a little material removal.

Ever heard of that or done it?
-Under permanent construction

ken cierp
Posts: 3924
Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2011 11:23 pm

Re: Thinning the Perimiter

Post by ken cierp » Fri Mar 07, 2014 7:06 am

Hmmmmm? In what measurable way does that improve or change the instrument? The science behind thinning the perimeter is simple -- and explainable, "the entire sound-board/diaphragm" is more flexible and it can move more freely -- reacting the to a lighter touch and resulting string motion. More responsive.

John Link
Posts: 800
Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2012 8:01 pm
Location: Kalamazoo, MI

Re: Thinning the Perimiter

Post by John Link » Sat Mar 08, 2014 1:17 pm

I'd like to see the Somogyi video. In his book he says he will sand anywhere on the braced top, if he thinks that area is too stiff for maximum responsiveness. He adjusts until the stiffness is similar across the entire top, measured by his ear and his finger. Thus, I suppose that, if he found the area behind the bridge out of whack with the rest of the top, he might sand it. He uses a small sanding block for this operation and says he goes about it with abundant caution.
John

Post Reply