Is the Devil really in the details?

Sequencing -- clamping schemes -- logic, do's and don'ts
Post Reply
Kevin in California
Posts: 2715
Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2011 4:19 pm

Is the Devil really in the details?

Post by Kevin in California » Wed May 31, 2017 1:17 pm

So I do you guys find the title statement to be true in your building of guitars? The more of them I build the more I find this to be so true.
I am only on my 13th guitar. I don't expect to ever make a perfect guitar, but I sure do expect that I should get better at making them. I am finding out that on every one I've built, I get caught not watching out for all the details.
It is the little things that can make a difference in the build quality and the aesthetics that keep getting me. I've decided that I must make a check off list of all the little detail areas I seem to forget to do and check and start to use it religiously
if I am going to move to (I hate the phrase) "to the next level" in my building. At 62 my ability to remember the details is fading it seems
So I'm wondering, how many of you guys use a check off list while building your guitars?

The one little deal that caught me on Monday was installing binding and purflings. I'm using BWB purfling, and at the back side, tail end I had a joint of the purfling and the binding. I made sure the two ends of the purfling fit together really well, nice and square. I glued in the binding and and the purfling on one side, then did the other side. All looked well, but.....two things I didn't do. One, I did not place the purfling joint a little behind the binding joint, which supports the purfling and keeps the joint inline. I've had done this correctly before. ARg. The second thing I neglected to do, is put a clamp end to end to pull that joint in snug. This I also always do. Both of these details I neglected. So the result was my purfling joint is tight but offset slightly, not much, probably only 1/128", but it is enough that it blares at me!!
I can and will live with it, but this is just one example of the things that catch me.

What do you guys do so the the devil doesn't visit you on the details?

Hans Mattes
Posts: 105
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2016 6:32 pm
Location: Petaluma, Calif.

Re: Is the Devil really in the details?

Post by Hans Mattes » Wed May 31, 2017 3:18 pm

As you've started a topic on "how could I possibly have done that," I've got one that may be hard to beat. My last build used a bolt-on neck from LMI, and, after gluing the sides to the head and tail blocks, I cut the hole for the sound port -- on the wrong side.

After a couple of days of slapping my forehead while asking that question, I started the recovery process which worked out OK. But my procedure for avoiding the devil's visits, periodic specific-to-the-build checklists, wouldn't have helped. I find that my devil is focussed on the sequence of events -- doing one thing too early so that later efforts are blocked or made more difficult. Interim checklists help me there; big, stupid mistakes (like confusing left from right) require more powerful tools -- which I (obviously) don't have.

John Link
Posts: 800
Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2012 8:01 pm
Location: Kalamazoo, MI

Re: Is the Devil really in the details?

Post by John Link » Fri Jun 02, 2017 5:34 pm

A clean and simple design, crisply executed, trumps an elaborate one with observable slop, much less one with gross errors. Complex feature sets help sell factory made products, but are not usually the "innovations" that marketing departments claim they are. Features tend to clutter my mind and create negative situations (my wording for "mistakes").
John

Post Reply